​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

As a Berry stockholder, you received this Proxy Statement because our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at its upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, at the Tropicana Executive Conference Center, 450 NW Riverside Dr., Evansville, Indiana 47708.

This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote on an informed basis at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares. See “How do I vote my shares before the Annual Meeting?” We will begin distributing this Proxy Statement, the attached notice of Annual Meeting and the proxy card(s) on or about January 22, 2021.

If you hold shares of Berry common stock, you are being asked to consider and vote on the following proposals:

1.

To elect ten director nominees named in this Proxy Statement to Berry’s Board of Directors for one-year terms;

​

2.

To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Berry’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2021;

​

3.

To approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, our executive compensation;

​

4.

To approve a proposal to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to reduce the ownership threshold required for stockholders to call a Special Meeting (“Governance Proposal”); and

​

5.

To approve the Amended and Restated 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan to, among other things, increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance by 8,250,000 shares (the “LTIP Amendment”).

​

Holders of outstanding common stock as of the close of business on January 11, 2021, the record date, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of January 11, 2021, 133,893,860 shares of common stock

were outstanding. Each holder of our common stock as of the record date will be entitled to one vote per share.

The Board of Directors recommends that holders of common stock vote (i) FOR the election of each director nominee; (ii) FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public

accountants for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2021; (iii) FOR approval of our executive compensation on a non-binding, advisory basis; (iv) FOR the Governance Proposal; and (v) FOR the LTIP Amendment.

Each holder of record of common stock on the record date will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares in your own name, you may submit a proxy by one of several methods:

•

Submitting a Proxy by Mail:   If you choose to submit a proxy by mail, simply mark the appropriate proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage paid envelope provided or to the address shown on the proxy card. The proxy card must be received by February 23, 2021.

​

•

Submitting a Proxy by Telephone or via the Internet:   If you choose to submit a proxy by telephone or via the Internet, follow the instructions provided on the proxy card. If you submit your proxy by telephone or via the Internet, you do not need to return a proxy card by mail. Internet and telephone proxy submission is available 24 hours a day. Proxies submitted by telephone or the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 23, 2021.

​

•

Submitting a Proxy in Person at the Annual Meeting:   You may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we recommend that you also submit your proxy by telephone or via the Internet, or by completing, signing, dating, and returning the attached proxy card by the applicable deadline so that your vote will be counted, if you later decide not to, or are unable to, attend the meeting.

​

By casting your vote, you are authorizing the individuals listed on the proxy to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted. Please check with your bank or broker and follow the voting procedures your bank or broker provides to vote your shares. Also, please note that if the holder of record of your shares is a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares and present that proxy and proof of identification at the Annual Meeting.

Shares held in street name are shares held electronically in the account of a broker. The actual stockholder is referred to as the beneficial owner. Stock exchange rules applicable to brokers grant your broker discretionary authority to vote your shares without receiving your instructions on certain matters. Your broker has discretionary voting authority under these rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our

independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2021. However, unless you provide voting instructions to your broker, your broker does not have authority to vote on the election of directors, approval of our executive compensation, the Governance Proposal or the LTIP Amendment. Therefore, it is particularly important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.

If you hold shares in your own name (i.e., do not hold shares in “street name”) and provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you hold shares in your own name and return your signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, we will vote on your behalf  (i) FOR the election of each director nominee; (ii) FOR the ratification of the selection

of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2021; (iii) FOR approval of our executive compensation on a non-binding, advisory basis; (iv) FOR the Governance Proposal; and (v) FOR the LTIP Amendment. If any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the designated proxies will vote on that matter in their discretion as well.

Holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as of the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. An “abstention” occurs when a stockholder sends in a proxy with explicit instructions to

decline to vote regarding a particular matter. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee who holds shares for the beneficial owner is unable to vote those shares for the beneficial owner because the broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power for the proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares.

Each director must be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to each director by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter (Proposal 1). The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2021 (Proposal 2); to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, our executive compensation (Proposal 3); to approve the Governance Proposal (Proposal 4); and to approve the LTIP Amendment (Proposal 5). A broker non-vote or an abstention with respect

to the election of directors is not a vote cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors (Proposal 1). An abstention with respect to Proposal 2, Proposal 3, Proposal 4 or Proposal 5 will not be voted, although it will be counted for the purpose of determining the number of shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a vote against Proposal 2, Proposal 3, Proposal 4 or Proposal 5. Broker non-votes have no effect on the outcome of the voting on Proposal 3, Proposal 4 and Proposal 5.

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:

•

Delivering to the Secretary a written notice of revocation, dated later than the proxy, before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting;

​

•

Delivering to the Secretary an executed proxy bearing a later date, before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting; or

​

•

Attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person (your attendance at the Annual Meeting, in and of itself, will not revoke the proxy).

​

Any written notice of revocation, or later dated proxy, should be delivered to:

Berry Global Group, Inc.
101 Oakley Street
Evansville, Indiana 47710
Attention: Jason K. Greene, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Alternatively, you may hand deliver a written revocation notice, or a later dated proxy, to the Secretary at the Annual Meeting before we begin voting.

If your shares are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by the bank, broker or other nominee if you wish to change your vote.

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may, if you wish, receive future Proxy Statements and annual reports online. If you elect this feature, you will receive either a proxy card or an e-mail message notifying you when the materials are available, along with a web address for viewing the materials. You may sign up for electronic delivery by marking and signing the appropriate spaces on your proxy card or by contacting our Investor Relations Department by e-mail at ir@berryglobal.com or by phone at (812) 306-2964. If you received these materials electronically, you do not need to do anything to continue receiving materials electronically in the future.

If you hold your shares in a brokerage account, you may also have the opportunity to receive proxy materials electronically. Please follow the instructions of your broker.

Electronic delivery saves Berry money by reducing printing and mailing costs. It will also make it convenient for you to receive your proxy materials online. Berry charges nothing for electronic delivery. You may, of course, incur the usual expenses associated with Internet access, such as telephone charges or charges from your Internet service provider.

You may discontinue electronic delivery at any time. For more information, contact our Investor Relations Department by e-mail at ir@berryglobal.com or by phone at (812) 306-2964.

Although we are currently planning to hold the Annual Meeting in person, in light of the ongoing public health concerns surrounding the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, we may deem it necessary to hold the Annual Meeting solely by means of remote communication (i.e., a virtual meeting) in lieu of an in-person meeting. If we decided to hold a virtual meeting, we

will announce it in advance in a press release, and details will be posted on our website and filed as additional proxy soliciting materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, if you are planning to attend our Annual Meeting, please monitor our website prior to the meeting date.

Thomas E. Salmon has been Chief Executive Officer of Berry since February 2017. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer of Berry, Mr. Salmon served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Berry since October 2016. He previously served as President of Berry’s Consumer Packaging Division from November 2015 until October 2016, President of Berry’s Rigid Closed Top Division from November 2014 until November 2015, and President of Berry’s Engineered Materials Division from 2003 until November 2014. Mr. Salmon serves on the board of directors and the compensation committee of Old National Bank. Mr. Salmon holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from Saint Bonaventure University in Western New York. Mr. Salmon’s position as our Chief Executive Officer, extensive familiarity with our Company and extensive experience in the plastics and packaging business qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.

B. Evan Bayh has been a member of our Board of Directors since October 2011. Mr. Bayh is a senior advisor with Apollo Global Management and is a former U.S. Senator and Indiana Governor. He was a member of the U.S. Senate from the State of Indiana from 1998 until his retirement in 2011. While in the Senate, he served on a variety of committees, including the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Prior to serving in the Senate, Mr. Bayh served as Indiana Governor from 1988 to 1997. Mr. Bayh also serves on the board of directors of Fifth Third Bancorp, Inc., Marathon Petroleum Corporation, RLJ Lodging Trust. He previously served on the board of directors of McGraw-Hill Education Inc. and Zenith American Mr. Bayh’s many years of service in elected office, including as the chief executive of a large Midwestern state, qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Jonathan F. Foster has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 2014. Since 2008 Mr. Foster has served as Founder and a Managing Director of Current Capital Partners LLC, a mergers and acquisitions advisory, corporate management services and private equity investing firm. From 2007 until 2008, Mr. Foster served as a Managing Director and Co-Head of Diversified Industrials and Services at Wachovia Securities. Mr. Foster has served in numerous key executive leadership positions including: Executive Vice President — Finance and Business Development of Revolution LLC; Managing Director of The Cypress Group; Senior Managing Director and Head of Industrial Products and Services Mergers and Acquisitions at Bear Stearns & Co; and Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of ToysRUs.com, Inc. Prior to the aforementioned positions, Mr. Foster was with Lazard, including as a Managing Director, for over 10 years, primarily in mergers and acquisitions.

Mr. Foster is a board member of Masonite International Corporation, Lear Corporation, and Five Point Holdings. He was previously a member of the board of directors of Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, and Chemtura Corporation, as well as a Trustee of the New York Power Authority. Mr. Foster has a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Emory University, a master’s degree in Accounting and Finance from the London School of Economics and has attended the Executive Education Program at Harvard Business School. Mr. Foster’s investment banking, finance, and investment experience qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Idalene F. Kesner has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 2014. Dr. Kesner has served as dean for Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business, since July 2013. Dr. Kesner joined the Kelley School faculty in 1995, coming from a titled faculty position at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. While at Indiana University, Dr. Kesner has served as co-director of the School’s Consulting Academy, Chairwoman of Kelley’s Full-Time M.B.A. Program, Chairwoman of the Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, and Associate Dean for Faculty & Research. In addition to teaching various graduate-level courses in the area of strategic management, Dr. Kesner has taught in more than 100 executive programs and served as a consultant for many national and international firms, working on strategic issues. Her research has focused on the areas of corporate boards of directors, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions. Dr. Kesner serves on the board of advisors for Lincoln Industries, and she serves on the board of directors for American Family Insurance and Olympic Steel, Inc. She was previously a member of the board of directors of Main Street America Group and Sun Life Financial. Dr. Kesner also serves on several non-profit boards including the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, and the Kelley Executive Education Foundation, Inc. Dr. Kesner holds an M.B.A. and Ph.D. in business administration from Indiana University and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Southern Methodist University. Dr. Kesner’s leadership and business acumen as well as her prior years of service on various corporate boards qualify her to serve as a director of the Company.

Jill A. Rahman has been a member of our Board of Directors since October 2020. Ms. Rahman is the Chief Operating Officer of the Greater Chicago Food Depository, a role she began in June 2020. From 2009 until June 2020 she served in several executive roles at Conagra Brands, Inc. (NYSE: CAG) including International Division President from 2016-2020 and U.S. Sweet and Salty Snacks Vice President and General Manager from 2010-2016. Ms. Rahman also held a variety of marketing, brand management, and strategic planning roles during her 15-year career at Kraft Foods and at Newell Rubbermaid. While at Conagra, she held Board of Director roles at joint venture companies in India, Mexico, and the Philippines. She serves on the board of directors of TreeHouse Foods Inc. Ms. Rahman earned a B.B.A. from Howard University and an M.B.A. from Indiana University. Ms. Rahman’s extensive executive management and

marketing experience, particularly in the consumer products industry, qualifies her to serve as a director of the Company.

Carl J. (Rick) Rickertsen has been a member of our Board of Directors since January 2013. Mr. Rickertsen is currently a managing partner of Pine Creek Partners, a private equity investment firm based in Washington, D.C., a position he has held since January 2004. He has worked in private equity since 1987. Prior to founding Pine Creek Partners in 2004, Mr. Rickertsen was chief operating officer and partner of Thayer Capital Partners from 1998 to 2004. Mr. Rickertsen was a founding partner of three Thayer investment funds and is a published author. He serves on the board of directors of MicroStrategy and Apollo Senior Credit Funds (AIF and AFT). He was formerly a board member of Noranda Corporation, Convera Corporation, UAP Holding Corp., and Homeland Security Capital Corporation. Mr. Rickertsen graduated with distinction from Stanford University and Harvard Graduate School of Business, obtaining a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Stanford and M.B.A. from Harvard. Mr. Rickertsen’s extensive business experience qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Ronald S. Rolfe has been a member of our Board of Directors since October 2013. Mr. Rolfe, currently an independent director and member of Audit Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee, will be retiring from the Board as of the Annual Meeting in accordance with the retirement age set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Until his retirement as a partner in 2010, Mr. Rolfe was a member of the Litigation Department at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP for more than 40 years. During his tenure, Mr. Rolfe led major antitrust and securities cases; SEC, NYSE, NASDAQ, and grand jury investigations; and, a wide range of commercial litigation and arbitrations. He was also active in major merger and acquisition transactions and corporate governance advice. Mr. Rolfe is a former board member of Time Inc. where he served as Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee and was a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. During the period 2014-2017 he was a director of Reynolds American, Inc. where he served on the Audit and Finance Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committees. During the period 2013-2016, Mr. Rolfe was a member of the board of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation where he served on the Environmental, Health, and Safety Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Rolfe is also a member of the boards of Advanced Assessment Systems, Inc. and Cloudlex, Inc. He holds an A.B. from Harvard College and graduated magna cum laude with a J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he served as an editor of the Columbia Law Review. Mr. Rolfe was also a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar and James Kent Scholar. Mr. Rolfe dedicates much time to both professional organizations and civic endeavors, including serving as President Emeritus and a Trustee of the board of The Allen-Stevenson School, a member of the Dean’s Council of Columbia Law School, a Co-Chair of the board, a Trustee and member of the Nominating and Governance Committee of De La Salle Academy, and a member of the board of Augustus Intelligence, Inc. Mr. Rolfe’s extensive experience working with public companies and governance issues in both legal counsel and director and committee member capacities qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Paula A. Sneed has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 2018. Ms. Sneed is the Chairperson and CEO of Phelps Prescott Group LLC (PPG), a strategy and management consultancy she cofounded in 2007. She retired from General Foods/Kraft Foods in 2006 after a 29 year career during which she held a variety of marketing, general management and senior executive roles including Executive Vice President and President of two operating divisions, Chief Marketing Officer, Executive Vice President e-Commerce and Executive Vice President, Global Marketing Resources and Initiatives. Ms. Sneed is a Director of Charles Schwab Corporation, The Family Independence Initiative, the Surge Institute, and New Schools Venture Fund. She is a former Director of Hercules Inc., Airgas Inc., TE Connectivity Ltd., Communispace Inc., American Marketing Association, Right To Play, Turnaround For Children, and Teach For America national and Chicago regional boards. She is also a former trustee of Simmons College and Illinois Institute of Technology. Ms. Sneed earned a BA from Simmons College and an MBA from Harvard Business School. She received an honorary Doctorate degree in Business Administration from Johnson and Wales University. Ms. Sneed’s extensive executive management and marketing experience, particularly in the consumer products industry, qualifies her to serve as a director of the Company.

Robert A. Steele has been a member of our Board of Directors since October 2014. In 2011, Mr. Steele retired from Procter & Gamble as the company’s Vice Chairman Health Care. During his 35-year tenure with Procter & Gamble, he served in a variety of executive leadership positions, including Vice Chairman Global Health and Well-being, Group President Global Household Care, and Group President of North American Operations. Mr. Steele is a board member of BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc., where he serves as the Lead Director and on the Audit Committee and Newell Brands Inc., where he serves on the Compensation Committee and serves as the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Steele was previously a member of the board of directors of the Keurig/​Green Mountain Coffee Company, Beam Inc., LSI Industries, Inc. and Kellogg Company. Mr. Steele has a bachelor’s degree in Economics from College of Wooster and a M.B.A. from Cleveland State University. Mr. Steele’s in-depth knowledge of the global consumer goods market and his leadership and business experience qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Stephen E. Sterrett has been a member of our Board of Directors since January 2015. Mr. Sterrett retired on December 31, 2014 as the Sr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group, Inc., a position he held since 2000. From 1993 to 2000 Mr. Sterrett held the position of Treasurer with Simon. Prior to joining the Simon organization in 1988 he was a senior manager with the international accounting firm of Price Waterhouse. Mr. Sterrett currently serves on the board of Equity Residential, an S&P 500 company. Mr. Sterrett was previously a member of the board of directors of Realty Income Corporation from 2014 to 2019. In 2018 he became a Trustee of Butler University, a private university in Indianapolis, Indiana. He serves as a Trustee of Tindley Accelerated Schools, a K-12 charter school network in Indianapolis, Indiana. Mr. Sterrett also serves on the board of directors of the following not for profit companies: the Indiana Golf Association and its Foundation, the Indiana University Center for Real Estate Studies and the Kelley School of Business Dean’s Council. Mr. Sterrett holds a B.S. degree in accounting and an M.B.A. in finance, both from Indiana University. Mr. Sterrett’s extensive accounting and financial experience qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Scott B. Ullem has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2016. Mr. Ullem became Chief Financial Officer of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in January 2014. Prior to joining Edwards, he served from May 2010 to December 2013 as Chief Financial Officer of Bemis Company Inc. Mr. Ullem served from 2008 to May 2010 as the Vice President, Finance of Bemis. Before joining Bemis, Mr. Ullem spent 17 years in investment banking, serving as Managing Director at Goldman Sachs and later for Bank of America. Mr. Ullem earned a bachelor’s degree in political science from DePauw University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Mr. Ullem’s extensive accounting and financial experience and in-depth knowledge of the packaging market qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.

Thomas E. Salmon

Age: 57
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

See page 11 above for biographical information for Mr. Salmon.

Mark W. Miles

Age: 49
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Mark W. Miles has been Chief Financial Officer since January 2014. Mr. Miles previously served as Berry’s Executive Vice President, Controller and Treasurer from August 2005 to January 2014. Mr. Miles started with the Company as Corporate Controller in 1997.

Curtis L. Begle

Age: 45
President, Health, Hygiene and Specialties Division

Curtis L. Begle has been President of Berry’s Health, Hygiene and Specialties Division since December 2018. He previously served as President of Berry’s Engineered Materials Division from November 2014 to December 2018 and as President of Berry’s Rigid Closed Top Division from December 2009 to November 2014. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Evansville and a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Southern Indiana.

Jean-Marc Galvez

Age: 54
President, Consumer Packaging — International Division

Jean-Marc Galvez has been President of Berry’s Consumer Packaging — International Division since July 2019. He previously served as President of Berry’s Consumer Packaging Division since January 2017 and President — Europe, Middle East, India, and Africa of Berry’s Health, Hygiene and Specialties Division from November 2015 to January 2017. He was President — EMEIA Global Building and Geosynthetics for AVINTIV, Inc. (“Avintiv”), which Berry acquired in 2015, from May 2014 to November 2015 and served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the EMEIA region at Polymer Group, Inc. from April 2012 to May 2014. He holds a master’s and bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from Ecole Nationale Superieure de Chimie in Montpellier, France and has completed its general manager executive education at IESE Business School.

Michael E. Hill

Age: 54
President, Engineered Materials Division

Michael E. Hill has been President of Berry’s Engineered Materials Division since December 2018. He previously served as Berry’s Executive Vice President and General Manager of various segments with the Consumer Packaging Division from November 2015 to December 2018. Mr. Hill started with Berry in 1997 during which time he held multiple positions of increasing responsibility in operations, sourcing, marketing, and sales. Mr. Hill holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Middle Tennessee State University and is also a certified Six Sigma Green Belt.

William J. Norman

Age: 49
President, Consumer Packaging — North America Division

William J. Norman has been President of Berry’s Consumer Packaging — North America Division since July 2019. He previously served as Berry’s Executive Vice President — Consumer Packaging Commercial Operations from February 2019 to July 2019, Executive Vice President & General Manager — Consumer Packaging Food from November 2015 to February 2019, and President — Rigid Open Top Division, a position he held from October 2013 to November 2015. Mr. Norman joined Berry in 1993 during which time he held managerial and vice president positions in accounting, finance, and commercial and strategic planning. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Southern Indiana.

Jason K. Greene

Age: 50
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Secretary

Jason K. Greene has been Berry’s Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since February 2016. He previously served as Berry’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel from January 2013 to February 2016. He was hired in December 2010 as Berry’s Deputy General Counsel. Mr. Greene holds a Bachelor of Accounting, Master of Accounting, and Juris Doctor all from the University of Florida.

James M. Till

Age: 43
Executive Vice President and Controller

James M. Till has been Berry’s Executive Vice President and Controller since January 2014. Mr. Till started with Berry in 2008, during which time he held multiple positions of increasing responsibility in accounting and finance. Mr. Till previously served as Berry’s Vice President of Accounting and Finance from November 2010 to January 2014.

Berry aspires to the highest ethical standards for our employees, officers and directors, and remains committed to the interests of our stockholders. We believe we can achieve these objectives only with a plan for corporate governance that clearly defines responsibilities, sets high standards of conduct and promotes compliance with the law. The Board of Directors

has adopted formal corporate governance guidelines, as well as policies and procedures designed to foster the appropriate level of corporate governance. Some of these guidelines, policies and procedures are discussed below.

Our Board of Directors has determined that all directors and director-nominees, with the exception of Mr. Salmon, satisfy the independence standards established by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Salmon is not considered independent under the listing standards of the NYSE because he is an employee of the Company.

In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent. In making such determination, the Board reviewed all relationships between the Company and each director.

When considering individuals to recommend for nomination to the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers both the requisite skills and characteristics of individual directors, as well as the composition of the Board of Directors as a whole. In the course of this assessment, the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider factors that include independence, skills, diversity (including viewpoint, professional experience, education, race, gender and national origin diversity) and industry or other relevant experience. The Nominating and Governance Committee may choose to engage the services of third-party consulting firms to assist during this process, as well.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider stockholder recommendations for director candidates, which should be submitted in writing to our principal executive offices at 101 Oakley Street, Evansville, IN 47710, in care of our Secretary, or, alternatively, by email to ir@berryglobal.com, along with the name of the candidate and all biographical and other information about the candidate that would be required to be included in a proxy statement under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a description of the relationship between the candidate and the recommending stockholder, the proposed candidate’s consent to serve as a director if elected and proof of the number of shares of our common stock owned by the recommending stockholder and the length of time such stockholder has owned those

shares. The Nominating and Governance Committee may request additional information and will then evaluate the proposed candidate based on the criteria described above. These procedures relate only to stockholder recommendations for director candidates to be considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Any stockholder who wishes to formally nominate a candidate must follow the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. See “Stockholder Proposals.”

Pursuant to the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, a holder (or a group of not more than 20 holders) of at least 3% of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years is entitled to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of our Board of Directors, provided that the nominating holder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws, including by providing us with advance notice of the nomination. For more detailed information on how to submit a nominee for inclusion in our proxy materials pursuant to the proxy access provisions, see “Stockholder Proposals — Proxy Access Director Nominees.”

Any stockholder who wishes to formally nominate a candidate without seeking access to our proxy materials must follow the procedures set forth in our Bylaws. See “Stockholder Proposals — Other Proposals and Nominees.”

At our 2020 Annual Meeting, the Company received a stockholder proposal requesting Berry to provide stockholders with the right to act by written consent. The proposal received the support of approximately 55% of the votes cast, representing approximately 45% of the outstanding shares of the Company. Following the approval of this proposal, the Company undertook a robust governance-focused stockholder outreach campaign to solicit stockholder feedback on adopting action by written consent as well as stockholders’ views on additional governance, compensation and sustainability matters. We reached out to stockholders owning 69% of our shares outstanding and engaged with stockholders owning 34% of our shares outstanding.

A majority of the stockholders we engaged, representing about 20.7% of shares outstanding, indicated that although they had voted for the written consent proposal, their support was intended to indicate their preference for enhanced stockholder rights, which they confirmed would be satisfied by reducing the threshold for calling special meetings. In addition, a

significant number of stockholders, representing 12.7% of outstanding shares who voted against the written consent proposal, voiced their concern that granting stockholders the right to act by written consent would create risk that a subset of stockholders could disenfranchise others and act without notifying all stockholders. They also noted that special meetings serve as a meaningful and effective tool for stockholder actions.

The Board and management valued the engagement process and feedback from stockholders.

Based on the feedback we received from stockholders, in lieu of offering a proposal to provide stockholders with the right to act by written consent, the Board has approved and recommended a proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation (and related amendment to our Amended & Restated Bylaws) to decrease the threshold necessary for stockholders to call a special meeting from 25% of outstanding shares to 15%. See Proposal 4.

During the 2020 fiscal year our Board of Directors held four regular meetings and four special meetings. Each director attended, either in person or by telephone, at least 90% of the aggregate of  (1) the total number of meetings of our Board of Directors held while he or she was a director during the last fiscal year and (2) the total number of meetings

held by all committees on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served on the committee during the last fiscal year. All directors have been invited to attend the Annual Meeting, but are not expected to attend. Mr. Salmon is the only director who attended the 2020 Annual Meeting.

Our Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee, an Audit Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board is independent. The charter for each committee of the Board of Directors is available on the

Corporate Governance tab of the Investors section of our website at www.BerryGlobal.com. The composition of the Committees as of the date of this proxy statement and the duties and responsibilities of each Committee is provided in the table below.

The Board of Directors has historically chosen to combine the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board so that the same person serves in both roles. While the Board believes it is important that the Company retain the organizational flexibility to determine whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board are separated or combined, the Board believes that combining the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman is in the Company’s best interest. This arrangement provides the benefit of having our Chief Executive Officer, the individual with primary responsibility for managing the Company’s day-to-day operations, chair regular Board meetings as the Board discusses key business and strategic issues. Coupled with a Lead Independent Director, the structure affords strong independent board leadership and engagement and oversight of management, promotes cohesiveness, and also allows for better alignment of strategic development and execution, more effective implementation of strategic initiatives, and clearer accountability for success or failure.

When the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles are combined as they are currently, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that we have a Lead Independent Director position to complement the Chairman’s role, and to serve as the principal liaison between the non-employee directors and the Chairman. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that Lead Independent Director be elected annually by the independent, non-employee directors. Mr. Sterrett currently serves as our Lead Independent Director, providing effective, independent leadership of our Board through his clearly defined and robust set of roles and

responsibilities, including presiding at meetings of independent directors and regularly scheduled executive sessions.

The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the independent directors and performs such other duties and responsibilities as the Board of Directors may determine. The specific responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director are as follows:

•

Preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

​

•

Call, coordinate, develop the agenda for, chair and moderate meetings of the independent directors;

​

•

Serve as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors;

​

•

Advise the Chairman as to the quality, quantity, and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to perform their duties effectively and responsibly;

​

•

Provide the Chairman with input regarding Board meeting agendas and schedules; and

​

•

Assist the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board and management related to compliance with and implementation of Corporate Governance Guidelines.

​

It is the direct responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer and the other members of management to manage the Company’s enterprise risks on a day-to-day basis. The Board of Directors has responsibility for the oversight of risk management on an enterprise-wide basis through regular updates from management and the strategic planning process. The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s major risk exposures and the results of an annual corporate-wide enterprise risk assessment, the related corporate guidelines, and policies for risk assessment and risk management. The Company’s approach to risk management is to identify, prioritize, monitor and appropriately mitigate all material business risks in order to support the Company’s strategy, including proper financial management and sustainable growth, while protecting and enhancing stockholder value. In addition, the Board of Directors delegates certain risk management oversight responsibilities to its committees; for example, the Audit

Committee is responsible for overseeing our material financial and other risk exposures, including risks relating to the financial reporting process and internal controls, as well as risks related to cybersecurity threats, the Company’s information technology systems and networks and related party transactions; the Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing risks relating to our compensation programs; and the Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing corporate governance-related risks. The Board and its committees oversee the execution of Berry’s environmental, social and governance strategies and initiatives as an integrated part of their oversight of the Company’s overall strategy and risk management. The Board is actively engaged with management on related topics such as management of human capital; sustainability goals; analysis of alternative pathways to achieve those goals; customer, investor and other stakeholder expectations; and the environmental impact of our Company.

Any person who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, including the independent directors, may direct a written communication, addressed to the Board of Directors or to the independent directors, to our principal executive offices at 101 Oakley Street, Evansville, IN 47710, in

care of our Secretary, or, alternatively, by email to ir@berryglobal.com. All correspondence will be logged and forwarded to the director or directors to whom it is addressed.

The Board encourages directors and Company management to hold a meaningful financial interest in the Company. Under the share ownership guidelines applicable to all non-employee directors, each non-employee director is expected to hold a financial stake in shares of Company common stock with a value equivalent to four times his or her annual cash retainer. Each non-employee director has five years after August 1, 2017, the date the guidelines were adopted, or five years after his or her initial election to the Board, whichever is earlier, to meet the ownership guidelines. Each of the non-employee directors was in compliance with the guidelines as of

December 31, 2020 or is reasonably proceeding with compliance as of the applicable five-year achievement period. Under the share ownership guidelines applicable to Company management, the Chief Executive Officer is required to hold a financial stake in shares of Company common stock in an amount equal to at least five times his annual base salary and the other Named Executive Officers are required to hold a financial stake in shares of Company common stock in an amount equal to at least three times their annual base salary. The Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers have five years after August 1, 2017, the date the

guidelines were adopted, or five years after his or her initial appointment to a qualifying management position, whichever is earlier, to meet the ownership guidelines. The Chief Executive Officer and the other Named

Executive Officers were in compliance with the guidelines as of December 31, 2020 or are reasonably proceeding with compliance as of the applicable five-year achievement period.

We have a Code of Business Ethics that applies to all directors, officers, and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Company’s policy is to conduct its business in accordance with the highest ethical, moral, and legal standards, efficiently, in good faith, with due care, and in the best interests of the Company, its employees, and stockholders. Each Company director, officer, and employee has a primary duty to act at all times to uphold these standards and to act with honesty, integrity and fairness, and without actual or apparent conflict of interest.

We also have adopted a Certification and Supplemental Code of Ethics (the “Supplemental Code”) applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, all Company directors, employees reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer, executive vice presidents, and regional presidents. The Company believes that the highest level of leaders at the Company have a responsibility to uphold the highest standards of integrity, to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, and to set an example of accountability for all others in the Company.

To codify this responsibility, the Company created the Supplemental Code, which is in addition to the standards set by our Code of Business Ethics, in order to establish a higher level of expectation for the most senior leaders of the Company. The Supplemental Code sets the expectations as to how our senior leaders conduct themselves in dealings with the Company, customers, suppliers and coworkers and it further defines our commitment to compliance with the Company’s policies, procedures and government

rules and regulations. Our Code of Business Ethics and the Supplemental Code can be obtained on our website.

The Company has an active ethics and compliance program, which includes:

•

An Ethics Committee, chaired by our Director of Corporate Compliance, that oversees management’s efforts to foster a culture of ethics and appropriate conduct within the Company. The Committee’s role is one of oversight, recognizing that management is responsible for continuously reinforcing and championing the Company’s sound ethics, responsible conduct and principled culture throughout our employee population. The Committee reports to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis.

​

•

Regular employee ethics and compliance training that sets the right tone, ensures our employees and third party representative know what’s expected of them, and helps create a culture of ethics and respect.

​

•

An ethics and whistleblower hotline that allows our employees to voice their concerns via phone or web intake in the instances where they may not feel comfortable voicing their concerns in person or directly to someone in the company.

​

•

A comprehensive set of policies and procedures regarding compliance with applicable laws and regulations and with the Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Supplier Code of Conduct.

​

For fiscal 2020, non-employee directors received cash compensation of $26,250 per quarter, plus $20,000 annually for serving as Chair of a Board committee and $35,000 annually for serving as Lead Independent Director,

and are also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their duties as directors. For fiscal 2020, non-employee directors earned fees and equity awards as shown in the following table.

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written policy for the review and approval or ratification of any transaction with any related party where the aggregate amount involved is expected to exceed $120,000 and in which any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, with the exception of  (i) certain transactions involving another company in which the related party’s only relationship is as a non-executive employee, director or less-than-10% equity owner or limited partner and (ii) certain additional exceptions. Under the policy, the Audit Committee shall review such related party transactions and may approve or ratify them only if it is determined that they are fair as to, and not inconsistent with the best interests of, the Company, considering all relevant facts and circumstances. When reviewing a related party transaction, the Audit Committee may take into consideration all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to it, including, to the extent relevant and feasibly provided: (a) the material terms and conditions of the transaction; (b) the related party’s relationship to the Company; (c) the related party’s interest in the transaction; (d) the approximate dollar value of the transaction and of the related party’s interest in the transaction; (e) the aggregate amount of all payments or installments to be made, in the case of a transaction providing for periodic payments or installments; (f) the aggregate amount of principal to be outstanding and interest rate payable, in the case of indebtedness; and (g) any other material information.

The policy requires any officer, director or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries who becomes aware of a potential related party transaction to notify the Chief Financial Officer or an Executive Vice President of the

Company, who shall then review the proposed transaction and, if it is expected to fall within the policy, present it to the Audit Committee for review. Under the policy, the Audit Committee must approve any related party transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of its disinterested members. If advance approval is not feasible, then the Audit Committee must ratify the related party transaction at its next regularly scheduled meeting or the transaction must be rescinded. In addition, the Chair of the Audit Committee may pre-approve or ratify any related party transaction in which the aggregate amount involved is reasonably expected to be less than $100,000.

Certain of the Company’s employees who invested in the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and President — Health, Hygiene and Specialties Division, entered into a stockholders agreement with the Company’s equity sponsors that was amended and restated upon completion of the Company’s initial public offering in October 2012 and most recently in January 2015 (the “Fourth Stockholders Agreement”). The Fourth Stockholders Agreement provides, among other things, for certain restrictions on the transferability of the equity ownership of the Company of each employee and certain other stockholders that are parties thereto, piggyback registration rights and repurchase rights by the Company in certain circumstances.

Other than as described above, the Company has not entered into any related party transactions required to be disclosed under Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations during fiscal 2020.

The following Report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

The Audit Committee is a separately-designated, standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. It is composed of three directors, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is an “independent director” as defined by NYSE listing standards. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The Board has also determined that the members of the Audit Committee meet the financial literacy requirements of NYSE listing standards.

Management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including systems of internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to engage the independent auditor and otherwise to monitor and oversee these processes.

For the fiscal year ended September 26, 2020, the Audit Committee engaged Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent auditor.

The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the financial statements for fiscal 2020 with management and with Ernst &

Young LLP. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2020 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Ernst & Young LLP audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2020 and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 26, 2020 and has issued a report thereon. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accountants matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accountants that firm’s independence. In addition, the Audit Committee approves in advance all services performed by the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee determined that Ernst & Young’s provision of non-audit services to the Company as described in “Matters Relating to Independent Registered Public Accountants” is compatible with maintaining that firm’s independence.

Based on these discussions and reviews, the Audit Committee determined that the audited financial statements for the Company’s last fiscal year should be included in our Company’s Form 10-K, and made a formal recommendation to the Board of Directors to that effect.

Members of the Audit Committee at the time of the filing of the Form 10-K who approved this report:

Stephen E. Sterrett
Carl J. Rickertsen
Ronald S. Rolfe

The Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis identifies and describes the basic principles, philosophies and rationale underlying our compensation decisions and programs as well as the key elements of compensation for our “Named Executive Officers” identified in our Summary Compensation Table below. The Compensation Committee made all final compensation decisions for our Chief Executive Officer and all executive officers, including each of our Named Executive Officers identified in our Summary Compensation Table below, for the 2020 fiscal year. For fiscal 2020, our Named Executive Officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table include our current Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the next three highest compensated executive officers serving as such at fiscal year-end. Below is a discussion of the principles outlining our executive compensation program.

Our goal as an employer is to ensure that our pay practices are equitable as compared to market practice, facilitate appropriate retention, and reward

exceptional performance. We have periodically conducted studies to better understand compensation programs of other manufacturing companies similar in size to the Company. Our studies have reviewed base salary, bonus, and long-term equity awards, and based on such studies, we believe that our overall compensation levels are competitive with other comparable companies.

The Company believes that executive compensation should be designed to align closely the interests of its executive officers and stockholders and to attract, motivate, reward and retain superior management talent. The Company utilizes the following guidelines pertaining to executive compensation:

•

pay compensation that is competitive with the practices of other manufacturing businesses that are similar in size to the Company;

​

•

provide wage enhancements aligned with the performance of the Company; and

​

•

pay for performance by:

​

■

setting performance goals determined (i) by the Compensation Committee for our Chief Executive Officer and (ii) by our Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee for other executive officers;

​

■

providing a short-term annual performance-based cash incentive opportunity through a bonus plan that is based upon achievement of these performance goals; and

​

■

providing long-term incentive opportunities in the form of equity awards in order to retain those individuals with the leadership abilities necessary for increasing long-term stockholder value while aligning their interests with the interests of our stockholders.

​

Role of Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee’s specific roles are to:

•

approve all compensation plans for the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and all other executive officers;

​

•

recommend to our Board of Directors all compensation plans for our Board of Directors;

​

•

approve the short-term compensation of the executive officers and recommend short-term compensation for members of our Board of Directors;

​

•

approve and authorize grants under the Company’s incentive plans, including all equity plans and long-term incentive plans;

​

•

lead the Board of Directors in its annual review of the executive officers’ performance; and

​

•

prepare the report on executive compensation required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations for inclusion in our annual Proxy Statement.

​

Role of Compensation Consultant and Benchmarking Analysis

In 2014 the Compensation Committee engaged Towers Watson (now known as Willis Towers Watson) to help design the Berry Global Group, Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as may be amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “2015 Plan”) and provide advice regarding the number of shares to be reserved thereunder. Willis Towers Watson’s assistance in designing the 2015 Plan included reviewing the Company’s outstanding stock option grants, providing detail on market-competitive plan design features, collecting and reporting on market-competitive rates on share overhang, annual burn rate, share value transfer rates and equity vehicles used and developing a final report based on management’s feedback and presenting such report to the Compensation Committee for review and approval.

Following the July 2019 acquisition of RPC Group, the Company utilized Willis Towers Watson to provide market benchmarking analysis and survey data for the executive leadership team. As a result of this review and the significantly increased size of the Company, the Compensation Committee approved, for certain executives, increases in fiscal 2020 base salaries, annual bonus targets and equity grants.

For 2020 executive compensation planning, our fiscal 2019 peer group was revised due to the increased size and global breadth of the Company by removing Graphic Packaging International, Inc., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Silgan Holdings Inc., and Sonoco Products Company and adding Ardagh Group SA, Akzo Nobel NV, International Paper, and Westrock Company. These revisions resulted in our fiscal 2020 peer group consisting of the following companies:

The Company reviewed potential peers from the packaging and specialty materials industries, taking into account global presence, revenues, enterprise value and market cap. The analysis and changes made were also reviewed with Willis Towers Watson. This peer group of companies had median revenue of  $10 billion and median market capitalization of $12.5 billion based on the most recent publicly available data as of December 31, 2019. The Company’s revenue and market capitalization at the end of fiscal 2020 was $11.7 billion and $7.2 billion respectively.

Role of Executive Officers

The performance goals of each of our executive officers are reviewed annually. This information, along with the performance of the Company and market data, determines the wage adjustment recommendation presented to the Compensation Committee. All other compensation recommendations with respect to our executive officers are made by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to policies established in consultation with the Compensation Committee and recommendations from our Human Resources Department.

The Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and determines the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation in light of the goals and objectives of the compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews, on at least an annual basis, the performance of the Chief Executive Officer as compared to the achievement of the Company’s goals and any individual goals. The Chief Executive Officer, together with the Human Resources Department, reviews annually the performance of each executive officer as compared with the achievement of the Company or operating division goals, as the case may be, together with each executive’s individual goals and makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to the executives. Both performance and compensation are evaluated to help the Company attract and retain high quality executives in vital positions and that their compensation, taken as a whole, is competitive and appropriate compared to that of similarly situated executives in other corporations within the Company’s industry.

Role of Stockholder Say-on-Pay Votes

At the Company’s March 4, 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 97% of the votes cast were voted in favor of the say-on-pay proposal. The Compensation Committee considered these results and believes the voting results reflect strong stockholder support for the Company’s approach to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers (as defined in Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table). In light of the positive result of such say-on-pay vote, we made no material changes to our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020.

Executive Compensation Program

The fiscal 2020 compensation of our executive officers was generally classified into the following three categories:

(1)

base salary,

​

(2)

short-term annual performance-based cash incentive under our Executive Bonus Plan, and

​

(3)

long-term equity awards in the form of Company stock options.

​

The Company has selected these elements because each is considered useful and/or necessary to meet one or more of the principal objectives of the Company’s business. Base salary and annual bonus targets are set with the goal of motivating our Named Executive Officers and adequately compensating and rewarding them on a day-to-day basis for the time spent and the services they perform. Our equity programs are geared toward providing an incentive and reward for the achievement of long-term business objectives, retaining key talent and more closely aligning the interests of management with those of our stockholders.

The compensation program for our Named Executive Officers is reviewed on an annual basis. In setting individual compensation levels for a particular executive, the total compensation package is considered, along with the executive’s past and expected future contributions to our business.

Base Salary

Our executive officers’ base salaries depend on their position within the Company, the scope of their responsibilities, the period during which they have been performing those responsibilities and their overall performance. Base salaries are reviewed annually and are generally adjusted from time to time to realign salaries with market levels after taking into account individual responsibilities, performance and experience. Following the acquisition of RPC, the Compensation Committee approved adjustments to fiscal 2020 base salaries for certain of our executive officers to reflect changes in position or responsibility.

Short-Term Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive

The Company has a long history of sharing profits with employees. This philosophy is embedded in our corporate culture and is one of many practices that has enabled the Company to continually focus on improvement and be successful.

The Berry Global Group, Inc. Executive Bonus Plan is intended to provide an incentive for superior work and to motivate covered key executives toward even greater achievement and business results, to tie their goals and interests to those of the Company and our stockholders and to enable us to attract and retain highly qualified executives.

The Executive Bonus Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee. Under the Executive Bonus Plan, we may pay bonuses (including, without

limitation, discretionary bonuses) to covered key executives, including our Named Executive Officers, based upon such terms and conditions as our Compensation Committee may in its discretion determine.

Our Compensation Committee approved fiscal year 2020 target values of awards and awards paid under the Executive Bonus Plan which, following the acquisition of RPC, included increases in fiscal 2020 annual bonus targets for certain executive officers. Depending on our overall business performance, which for fiscal year 2020 was specifically related to our attainment of Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, each Named Executive Officer, other than the Chief Executive Officer, was eligible to receive a bonus under the Executive Bonus Plan ranging from zero to 160% of his or her annual base salary, with 80% being the target bonus. Our Chief Executive Officer was eligible to receive a bonus under the Executive Bonus Plan ranging from zero to 250% of his annual base salary, with 125% being the target bonus. These targets were subject to change at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Performance objectives are generally set on an annual basis. The applicable performance period was the 2020 fiscal year.

In determining the fiscal year 2020 target values of awards under the Executive Bonus Plan, 75% of the target value of the award was based on attaining 100% of the applicable annual Adjusted EBITDA target, and 25% was based on attaining 100% of the free cash flow target. The pro forma contribution from acquisitions is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of determining Executive Bonus Plan payouts as the activity is prior to Berry ownership. Similarly, unrealized cost savings are not included in determining achievement of Adjusted EBITDA except to the extent expressly approved by the Compensation Committee. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that is not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or operating income presented in accordance with GAAP. We define Adjusted EBITDA for Executive Bonus Plan purposes as Operating EBITDA adjusted for unrealized cost synergies approved by the Compensation Committee. We define Operating EBITDA as net income before depreciation and amortization, income tax expense, interest expense (net), and certain non-recurring or non-cash charges, which are more particularly described in our debt documents. We define free cash flow for Executive Bonus Plan purposes as cash flow from operating activities less net additions to property, plant and equipment.

Fiscal year 2020 bonus payments under the Executive Bonus Plan are directly tied to the performance of the Company. Upon approval by our Compensation Committee, bonuses are generally paid, to the extent earned, on an annual basis on a date determined by the Compensation Committee.

We have historically used stock options to provide long-term incentive to our key employees. Stock options encourage retention through the vesting period and incentivize performance since the options only have value to the extent the market value of our stock increases.

The Company historically grants annual option awards, if any, shortly following the announcement of our fiscal year end results based on a consistent value determined as a multiple of base salary, with limited performance-based exceptions.

In fiscal 2020 we granted stock option awards with respect to approximately 2.6 million shares in the aggregate to non-employee directors, employees and officers, including our Named Executive Officers as set forth in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below.

The exercise price for option awards is the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair market value of a share of our common stock is determined for this purpose by reference to the public trading price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant of the option (e.g.,

using a weighted average or closing price). The Compensation Committee is not prohibited from granting awards at times when it is in possession of material nonpublic information. However, no material nonpublic information was taken into account in determining the number of options previously awarded or the exercise price for those awards, and we did not “time” the release of any material nonpublic information to affect the value of those awards.

Generally, the options granted up through the end of fiscal 2020 become and exercisable over a five-year period. Unless set forth otherwise in the applicable award agreement, time-based options generally vest in 20% increments on each of the first five (5) anniversaries of the grant date. In each case, the vesting of options is generally subject to the grantee’s continued employment at the Company or at one of its subsidiaries as of the applicable vesting date (subject to certain exceptions, as described below); provided, that award agreements generally provide that options will vest pro rata, on a monthly basis, if a grantee’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause after the first anniversary of the grant date.

The maximum term of options granted is ten (10) years. Subject to certain exceptions set forth in the applicable stock option award agreement, unvested options are automatically forfeited upon termination. The outstanding option awards provide (i) accelerated vesting of all unvested options upon an employee’s death or permanent disability and (ii) in the event of an employee’s qualified retirement, continuation of the normal vesting period applicable to the retiree’s unvested options, as well as an extension of the exercise period to the end of the original ten-year term of the retiree’s vested options.

With respect to options granted under the 2015 Plan, no award will vest or become payable solely as a result of a change in control, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or award program, and we have not granted any equity awards under the 2015 Plan that would vest or become payable solely as a result of a change in control. On July 20, 2016, the Company amended outstanding stock option awards in order to further implement market-based compensation practices in line with compensation practices of similarly situated, publicly-traded companies as presented by Willis Towers Watson and other publicly available benchmarking studies. Each outstanding option was amended to provide for full vesting and exercisability of stock options following any termination of employment without “cause” and not due to “disability” ​(both, as defined in the applicable award agreement) or any resignation for “good reason,” if applicable (as defined in the recipient’s employment agreement) within the two years following a “change in control.” In that case, the options will also continue to be exercisable for the remaining term of the applicable award. Any change in control rights in the applicable awards prior to giving effect to these amendments were preserved to the extent they could apply more than two years following a change in control.

The 2015 Plan contains a definition of  “change in control,” although the plan committee may provide a different definition in an award agreement or award program. “Change in control” under the 2015 Plan is generally: (1) the acquisition by a person or group, together with stock the person or group already holds, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company, (2) the replacement of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors in a twelve-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by at least two-thirds of the incumbent members of the Board of Directors (including those endorsed by at least two-thirds of the incumbent directors, but excluding any director who assumes office in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest), (3) a reorganization, merger, share exchange, combination or consolidation that results in stockholders of the Company prior to such transaction owning 50% or less of the combined voting power of the resulting company immediately after the transaction, or (4) the sale, transfer or assignment of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to any third party. However, solely for awards which are subject to Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 409A and provide for payment on a change in control, “change in control” means an a “change in control event” under IRC Section 409A unless otherwise provided in the award.

Fiscal 2021 Equity-Based Compensation

In order to more closely align the interests of its executive officers and stockholders, the Compensation Committee determined that beginning in fiscal 2021 (effective with the November 23, 2020 grants) the annual equity awards to our executive officers will consist of 67% stock options and 33% performance-based restricted stock units (fiscal 2021 performance-based restricted stock units will be settled only in cash). Unless set forth otherwise in the applicable award agreement, (i) time-based options generally vest in 25% increments on each of the first four (4) anniversaries of the grant date and (ii) performance-based restricted stock units vest, based on the achievement of performance criteria (relative TSR and ROCE targets, each with a 50% weighting factor), at the end of the applicable three-year performance period.

The stock options granted in fiscal 2021 provide for full vesting and exercisability following any involuntary termination of employment without “cause (as defined in the award agreement) or any resignation for “good reason,” if applicable (as defined in the recipient’s employment agreement) within the two years following a change in control. Those stock options also provide that an additional forty percent (40%) of the shares underlying the stock option shall vest and become exercisable (not to exceed one hundred percent (100%) vested) following any involuntary termination of employment without “cause (as defined in the award agreement) or any resignation for “good reason,” if applicable (as defined in the recipient’s employment agreement) more than two years after a change in control.

The performance-based restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2021 provide that the service condition is deemed met following any involuntary termination of employment without “cause (as defined in the award agreement) or any resignation for “good reason,” if applicable (as defined in the recipient’s employment agreement) within the two years following a change in control. Those performance-based restricted stock units also provide that upon an involuntary termination of employment more than two years after a change in control, an additional forty percent (40%) of the service condition is deemed met (not to exceed one hundred percent (100%)).

Compensation Programs and Risk Management

We have determined that any risks arising from our compensation programs and policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Our compensation programs and policies mitigate risk by combining performance-based, long-term compensation elements with payouts that are highly correlated to the value delivered to the Company and its stockholders. The combination of performance measures applicable to annual bonuses and equity compensation awards granted to our executive officers and the multi-year vesting schedules applicable to equity awards granted to our executives encourage our executives to maintain both a short-term and long-term view with respect to Company performance.

Post-Employment Compensation

We provide post-employment compensation to our employees, including termination rights and benefits pursuant to employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers, as a continuation of our historical practices. The Compensation Committee believes that offering such compensation allows us to attract and retain qualified employees and executives in a highly competitive marketplace and rewards our employees and executives for their contribution to the Company during their employment.

A principal component of our post-employment compensation program is a qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan, which applies to all of our U.S. employees generally. Under the 401(k) plan, the Company awards a $200 lump sum contribution annually for participating in the plan and the Company matches fifty percent (50%) of the applicable participant’s 401(k)

plan elective deferrals (not to exceed six percent (6%) of base compensation) made during the plan year.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the perquisites provided to our executive officers to ensure that they are reasonable, competitive and consistent with the overall compensation program. Such perquisites include for certain of our executive officers (as set forth in more detail in the Summary Compensation Table below and accompanying footnotes) use of a Company-provided car or car allowance, and, for our Chief Executive Officer, financial planning and tax return preparation and limited personal use of the Company’s corporate aircraft.

Compensation Recoupment Policy

In the event the Company is required to restate its financial statements because a covered executive willfully committed an act of fraud, dishonesty, or recklessness in the performance of the covered executive’s duties, the Compensation Committee is authorized to recoup (clawback) incentive compensation awarded to a covered executive in accordance with its Compensation Recoupment Policy. This recoupment policy reflects the Company’s culture that emphasizes integrity and accountability, and that reinforces the Company’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Berry policy prohibits directors, executive officers and key employees from engaging in publicly traded options and hedging transactions with regard to Berry securities, including the pledging of shares of Berry stock to secure personal loans.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

IRC Section 162(m) places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation a public company can deduct in any one year for certain specified executive officers, except for qualifying performance-based compensation for tax years which began on or before December 31, 2017. While the Compensation Committee has historically considered the deductibility of awards as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions, as noted above, and retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the awards are not deductible for tax purposes.

The exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of  $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

Despite our efforts in the past to structure annual cash incentives in a manner intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) and therefore not subject to its deduction limits, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief under the legislation repealing Section 162(m)’s exemption from the deduction limit, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 162(m) in fact will be exempt. Further, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m), if it determines that such modifications are consistent with our business needs.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” included in this Proxy Statement. Based on such review and discussions, the

Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.

During fiscal 2020, no officer or employee served as a member of the Compensation Committee and none of the members of the

Compensation Committee had any relationship required to be disclosed by Section 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.

The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid during the last three fiscal years to each person serving as our chief executive officer and chief financial officer during the most recent fiscal

year, and each of the other three most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of the most recent fiscal year (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

On January 31, 2017, the Company and Mr. Salmon entered into an employment agreement associated with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, which became effective February 3, 2017. The agreement replaces his prior employment agreement, which was last amended July 20, 2016. The initial term of the agreement is five years, which shall automatically renew for successive one-year periods unless written notice of an intent not to renew is provided by either party at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial or any subsequent term. Mr. Salmon’s annual base salary under the agreement is subject to annual adjustment at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Among other things, the agreement generally entitles Mr. Salmon to participate in all employee benefit plans maintained by the Company which are generally available to senior executives and provides that Mr. Salmon shall be eligible for an annual performance-based bonus determined based on a target percentage specified by the Compensation Committee of his then-current annual base salary. The agreement also provides that Mr. Salmon is entitled to personal use of the Company’s aircraft in accordance with Company policy. The agreement includes customary clawback, noncompetition, nondisclosure and nonsolicitation provisions. If Mr. Salmon is terminated by the Company without “cause” or if he resigns for “good reason,” ​(as defined in the agreement) in either case subject to his execution of a release of claims and compliance with the restrictive covenants set forth in his agreement, he is entitled to (1) cash severance equal to 18 months’ base salary (unless such termination occurs within two years following a “change in control,” ​(as defined in the agreement) in which case the cash severance amount is equal to the sum of 18 months’ base salary and 1.5 times Mr. Salmon’s then-current target annual bonus), payable in bi-monthly installments, (2) a prorated bonus based on actual performance for the year in which termination occurs and the relative period of such year during which Mr. Salmon was employed, payable within the first two and one-half months of the year following the year in which termination occurs, and (3) for a period of up to 18 months, a monthly amount equal to the amount by which the monthly COBRA continuation coverage premium exceeds the monthly premium an active employee would pay for the same coverage under the Company’s group medical plans; provided, that if Mr. Salmon becomes reemployed with another employer and is eligible to receive medical benefits under that employer’s group medical plans, such monthly payments shall cease for any period of time during which he remains eligible for coverage under his new employer’s group medical plans.

Messrs. Miles, Begle, and Greene are party to agreements that remain in effect unless terminated according to the agreements’ terms. Salaries are subject in each case to annual adjustment at the discretion of the Company. The employment agreements generally entitle each executive to participate in all employee benefit plans maintained by the Company which are

generally available to senior executives. The employment agreements also include customary noncompetition, nondisclosure and nonsolicitation provisions. The Company may terminate the employment agreements for “cause” or due to a “disability” ​(as such terms are defined in the agreements). If Messrs. Miles or Begle is terminated by the Company without “cause” ​(as such term is defined in their respective agreements), the executive is entitled to: (1) a pro rata portion of the annual bonus awarded to the executive for the year in which termination occurs, and (2) severance benefits pursuant to the provisions of the Berry Global, Inc. Severance Pay Plan in effect on the date of termination. If Mr. Greene is terminated by the Company without “cause” ​(as such term is defined in his agreement), the executive is entitled to severance benefits pursuant to the provisions of the Berry Global, Inc. Severance Pay Plan in effect on the date of termination.

On July 20, 2016, the Company agreed to amendments to the employment agreements of Messrs. Miles, Begle, and Greene that provide enhanced severance benefits on terminations of employment without “cause” or resignations for “good reason” ​(as such terms are defined in the amendments or agreement as applicable) (a “qualifying termination”), in either case, within the two years following a “change in control” ​(as such term is defined in the amendments or agreement as applicable).

The enhanced severance benefits made available to Messrs. Miles, Begle, and Greene include: (i) payment of an amount equal to one and one-half (or one, in the case of Mr. Greene) times the employee’s annual base salary and target annual bonus as of the date of qualifying termination over a period of eighteen (18) months (or twelve (12) months, in the case of Mr. Greene), payment of a prorated annual bonus only as, if, and when annual bonuses are paid to other employees of the Company who hold a position similar to the position the employee held prior to his qualifying termination, and (iii) if the employee elects COBRA continuation coverage, payment of an amount equal to the monthly amount of COBRA continuation coverage minus the portion of the amount the individual would have paid had he still been employed until the earlier of  (A) his employment by another employer who offers him medical coverage or (B) eighteen (18) months (or twelve (12) months, in the case of Mr. Greene) following the qualifying termination.

On September 30, 2015, the Company’s Spanish subsidiary entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Galvez in accordance with local practice that remains in effect unless terminated according to the agreement’s terms. The agreement specifies that Mr. Galvez is entitled to base salary, short term incentive compensation, use of a Company car, medical coverage and termination provisions. The employment agreement also includes a customary nondisclosure provision. The Company may

terminate the employment agreement without cause or as a result of Mr. Galvez’s breach of his employment obligations. If Mr. Galvez is terminated by the Company without cause or, pursuant to local law, if Mr. Galvez terminates the agreement within 3 months after a change in control of the Company’s Spanish subsidiary, the executive is entitled to severance benefits to include 16 months’ of  (i) base salary, (ii) short term incentive compensation, and (iii) benefits. If Mr. Galvez is terminated by the Company due to a serious and willful breach by him of his obligations, he is not entitled to severance benefits.

On December 18, 2016 the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “2016 Letter Agreement”) with Mr. Galvez pursuant to which we agreed to provide Mr. Galvez with expatriate benefits relating to his international assignment in the U.S., which began in April 2017. The additional benefits that he received were directly related to the additional expenses Mr. Galvez incurred as a result of his U.S. assignment. His benefits under the 2016 Letter Agreement included relocation expenses to the U.S., payments for housing, cost of living, payments and services in accordance with the Company’s tax equalization policy, transportation benefits subject to country guidelines, participation in the Company’s U.S. health plan, reimbursement of home-leave expenses and tax preparation assistance. In addition, upon the completion of his international assignment, we would pay for necessary and reasonable expenses (as determined under the Company’s International Assignment Policy) to relocate Mr. Galvez back to Spain or to another Berry location. In the event the Company terminated Mr. Galvez’s employment for cause or Mr. Galvez voluntarily terminated his employment, other than for exceptional circumstances, he was not

entitled to relocation benefits and all expatriate benefits would have ceased with the exception of tax preparation services and those available under the Company’s tax equalization policy. If the Company terminated Mr. Galvez’s U.S. assignment without cause, and Mr. Galvez elected to return to his home country within 3 months of termination, he would have been entitled to specified relocation benefits and all expatriate benefits would cease with the exception of tax preparation services and those available under the Company’s tax equalization policy.

On November 25, 2019 the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “2019 Letter Agreement”) with Mr. Galvez relating to his current international assignment in the U.K., which began July 1, 2019. Pursuant to the 2019 Letter Agreement (i) the terms of the 2016 Letter Agreement (other than certain continuing tax preparation benefits) and the U.S. assignment described therein were terminated and (ii) we agreed to provide Mr. Galvez with a specified base salary, subject to annual adjustment at the discretion of the Company, participation in certain employee benefit plans maintained by the Company, a housing allowance, utility expense reimbursement, and tax preparation assistance.

The following table estimates the potential payments and benefits to our Named Executive Officers upon termination of employment or a change in control, assuming such event occurred as of September 26, 2020. These estimates do not reflect the actual amounts that will be paid to such persons upon such events in the future, if any, the amounts of which would only be known at the time the persons become eligible for payment and would be payable only if the specified event occurs.

With respect to options granted under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), if the employment of the participant is terminated at any time following a “change in control” of the Company for any reason other than for cause, the death or disability of the participant, or the voluntary termination of employment by the participant, 40% of each grantee’s unvested options become vested. With respect to options granted under the 2015 Plan, no award will vest or become payable solely as a result of a change in control, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or award program. We have not granted any equity awards under the 2015 Plan that would vest or become payable solely as a result of a change in control. In the case of a termination of employment due to death or permanent disability, all of the employee’s unvested options will immediately vest.

On July 20, 2016, the Company amended outstanding stock option awards to provide for full vesting and exercisability following any termination of employment without “cause” and not due to “disability” or any resignation for “good reason,” if applicable, within the two years following a “change in control.” In that case, the options will also continue to be exercisable for the remaining term of the applicable award. Any change in control rights in the applicable awards prior to these amendments were preserved to the extent they could apply more than two years following a change in control.

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”) and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following estimate of the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Thomas E. Salmon, our CEO, as of the end of our 2020 fiscal year.

For fiscal 2020:

•

The median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, other than our CEO, was $34,769.

​

•

The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement was $10,078,611.

​

Based on this information, we reasonably estimate that for fiscal 2020 our CEO’s annual total compensation was approximately 290 times that of the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees.

We took the following steps to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO.

1.

We determined that, as of September 1, 2020, our employee population consisted of approximately 47,350 individuals. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time and temporary employees employed with us as of the determination date.

​

2.

As allowed under SEC rules and Dodd-Frank, the company can exclude up to 5% of its total workforce who are non-U.S. employees as well as individuals who became employees as the result of a recent acquisition to determine and identify the median employee. We excluded 2,112 employees (~4.5% of the company’s total population) from the following countries:

​